MDA vs. DA Made Simple: A Guide to IFR Minimums

By Pilot Institute
Posted on December 12, 2024 - 6 minute read

Are you wondering what MDA and DA mean for your instrument flying? Curious about when you’d use one over the other?

If you’re on a non-precision or precision approach, understanding MDA (Minimum Descent Altitude) and DA (Decision Altitude) is incredibly important.

We’ll cover what each term means, how they’re different, and when to use them.

Ready to clear up the confusion around MDA vs DA? Keep reading.

Key Takeaways

  • MDA applies to non-precision approaches, requiring pilots to level off at a minimum altitude.
  • DA is for precision approaches, requiring a decision to land or go around at a specific altitude.
  • The main difference: MDA involves leveling off, while DA involves deciding during descent.
  • Circling approaches and APV are unique cases that don’t fit the general rule.

Understanding MDA and DA in IFR Approaches

Chart explaining MDA and DA as the lowest altitudes to descend without runway visibility, with instructions for missed approaches if not visible.

How do you land an aircraft if you can’t see well because of clouds or fog? 

Pilots use special paths called IFR approaches to help them line up with the runway. These paths guide the airplane safely during its descent.

But flying down when you can’t see can be risky. There might be hills, buildings, or tall trees below.

So, how do you make sure you won’t hit anything?

IFR approaches use something called approach minimums.

Minimums are the lowest height you can go without seeing the runway. If you can’t see it by that height, you must stop descending and try again.

MDA and DA are two types of minimums.

Key Differences Between MDA, DA, and DH (Decision Height)

Chart comparing DA, MDA, and DH with explanations for precision and non-precision approaches, including vertical guidance and altitude measurement differences.

There are two kinds of minimum altitudes for two kinds of approaches:

  • MDA (Minimum Descent Altitude): Used in non-precision approaches like VOR or some GPS approaches. These don’t give vertical guidance.
  • DA (Decision Altitude): Used in precision approaches like ILS. These provide vertical guidance, helping pilots know if they’re too high or too low.

Both MDA and DA are measured from sea level, just like the altimeter in the airplane.

Sometimes, you might see DH (Decision Height). This is like DA but measured from the runway’s height above sea level.

For example:

If the DA is 5,000 feet and the runway is at 4,000 feet, then:

DH = 5,000 – 4,000 = 1,000 feet

DH is used when pilots use a special instrument called a radio altimeter. Radio altimeters display height above ground, not altitude. That’s why it makes sense for these approaches to use DH.

It’s easier for pilots since they don’t have to calculate the DH every time.

Let’s talk about each type in more detail.

MDA in Non-Precision Approaches

Check this for grammar, spelling errors, punctuation errors, and content accuracy. Then create short alt text for this image. Do not use quotation marks.

You’ll see MDA used when the approach doesn’t give vertical guidance.

What does that mean?

It just means the aircraft’s instruments won’t automatically show you if you’re too high or too low. You have to follow the chart manually.

For example, a chart might ask you to:

  • Fly at 7,500 feet at one point.
  • Cross the next point after dropping down to 6,600 feet.

These are called step-down altitudes because the descent looks like climbing down some stairs.

The lowest altitude the pilot can fly without seeing the runway is the MDA.

Here’s how to fly an approach with an MDA:

  1. Prepare yourself by briefing the chart before you actually fly it. Note the MDA listed in the minima table.
  2. Start the approach by flying to the point where the instrument procedure begins.
  3. Follow the path shown on the chart. Your instruments will show you if you need to turn left or right, but they won’t tell you whether you need to climb or descend. Make sure you cross each point at the altitude marked on the chart.
  4. Once you reach the MDA, check if you can see the runway.
    1. If you see the runway, continue your descent to land.
    2. If you don’t see it, stop descending. Fly level at the MDA and keep looking for the runway.
  1. Don’t see the runway by the time you reach the missed approach point? Go around and try again.

DA in Precision Approaches

Diagram explaining DA in precision approaches, showcasing vertical guidance and the decision to descend or go around without leveling off.

Approaches that use DA have some minor but crucial differences.

All precision approaches use DA or DH. Precision approaches give the pilots vertical guidance using radio beacons or GPS. This lets you know, at all times, whether you’re coming in too high or too low.

What difference does it make compared to an approach with an MDA?

It means that the pilot can descend smoothly through the final approach. The descent looks like a playground slide.

Here’s how you fly an approach with a DA:

  1. Prepare the approach by looking at the chart and performing a briefing. Notice the path doesn’t turn flat at the end. Note the DA listed in the minima table.
  2. Fly to the initial point to start the instrument procedure.
  3. Follow the path shown on the chart. You have to follow the altitude limits until you capture the ILS.
  4. Once your instruments capture the ILS or GPS signals, they’ll show if you need to increase or decrease your descent.
  5. As you get close to the DA, check if you can see the runway.
    1. If you see the runway, continue your descent to land.
    2. If you don’t see it, you have to go around immediately.

The crucial difference between the DA and the MDA is that you can’t fly level at the DA.

DH in Precision Approaches

Chart illustrating DH in precision approaches, with "CAT II RA 107" example and explanation of minima listing differences.

Wondering how approaches with DH work?

An approach with a DH is flown exactly the same as one with DA. The only notable difference is how it’s written in the minima table.

As an example, the minima table for an approach like this may say something like: CAT II RA 107.

CAT II means Category II ILS. The RA means Radio Altitude. Remember we mentioned that’s why these approaches use DH?

So, for this approach, you’ll be at the DH when your radio altimeter reads 107 feet.

The approach plate helpfully lists the DA as well. Don’t have a functioning radio altimeter? Use the DA instead.

Exceptional Cases

It’s generally true that DA/DH is meant for precision approaches, and non-precision approaches use MDA. But there are some special cases you should know about.

APV Approaches

Some RNAV approaches, such as LPV or LNAV/VNAV, are labeled as Approaches with Vertical Guidance.

In actual use, they operate just like any other precision approach. They use DA or DH since they have vertical guidance.

Legally, however, ICAO doesn’t classify them as precision approaches. That’s how they’re an exception to the general rule.

Circling Approaches

Chart explaining MDA in circling approaches, highlighting its use over DA and the reasons for higher altitudes.

These are complex approaches. You’ll see them in places where a straight-in approach isn’t feasible.

What happens in a circling approach?

  1. Follow an instrument approach to find your way to the airport.
  2. Descend all the way down to the circling MDA(if applicable). Make visual contact with the airport.
  3. Level off at the MDA and circle around to another runway. Keep the airport in sight at all times.
  4. Align the aircraft with the runway and land visually.

Circling approaches always use MDA, even if you use a precision approach like an ILS for guidance. 

The MDA is almost always higher than the DA for the precision approach since this is a complex maneuver.

Conclusion

Now that you know the basics of MDA and DA, making sense of IFR minimums should feel a lot simpler!

MDA is your go-to altitude for non-precision approaches, where you wait to see the runway before going any lower. DA is used in precision approaches.

So, next time you’re flying an IFR approach, you’ll be ready to handle those minimums! 

If you want to learn more about flying with instruments, we suggest checking out Instrument Rating Made Easy courses for help.